The response of EU trade dependent firms to the globalization backlash

Louise Curran; Jappe Eckhardt

doi:10.1504/EJIM.2021.10037410

The response of EU trade dependent firms to the globalization backlash

Louise Curran, Jappe Eckhardt

Politics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This paper seeks to expand our understanding of Corporate Political Activity (CPA) in trade policy by exploring the strategic responses of EU trade dependent firms (TDFs) to the recent backlash against globalization. We develop propositions on likely corporate strategies in this context and explore them in the EU. Our empirical focus is on four cases of trade policy changes over the period 2016-19 which reduced, or threatened to reduce, openness in different ways and with varying sectoral impacts. Propositions were explored through the analysis of public actions by TDFs and their associations, as well as 26 interviews. We find that few EU TDFs mobilized independently against protectionism. Rather, they overwhelmingly worked through their trade associations. Furthermore, the extent to which sectoral associations mobilized together or alone varied depending on the issue area and nature of the threats. We find limited evidence of trans-national lobbying or mobilization with civil society groups beyond the specific issue of Brexit.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	283-328
Number of pages	46
Journal	European Journal of International Management
Volume	18
Issue number	2/3
Early online date	10 May 2021
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2021.10037410
Publication status	Published - 4 Jul 2022

Bibliographical note

This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details

Access to Document

10.1504/EJIM.2021.10037410

Curran&Eckhardt 2021_EJIM
This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details
Accepted author manuscript, 1.02 MB

Cite this

@article{df470250abbb45d0ab39c5ee3b775d42,

title = "The response of EU trade dependent firms to the globalization backlash",

abstract = "This paper seeks to expand our understanding of Corporate Political Activity (CPA) in trade policy by exploring the strategic responses of EU trade dependent firms (TDFs) to the recent backlash against globalization. We develop propositions on likely corporate strategies in this context and explore them in the EU. Our empirical focus is on four cases of trade policy changes over the period 2016-19 which reduced, or threatened to reduce, openness in different ways and with varying sectoral impacts. Propositions were explored through the analysis of public actions by TDFs and their associations, as well as 26 interviews. We find that few EU TDFs mobilized independently against protectionism. Rather, they overwhelmingly worked through their trade associations. Furthermore, the extent to which sectoral associations mobilized together or alone varied depending on the issue area and nature of the threats. We find limited evidence of trans-national lobbying or mobilization with civil society groups beyond the specific issue of Brexit.",

author = "Louise Curran and Jappe Eckhardt",

note = "This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher{\textquoteright}s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details",

year = "2022",

month = jul,

day = "4",

doi = "10.1504/EJIM.2021.10037410",

language = "English",

volume = "18",

pages = "283--328",

journal = "European Journal of International Management",

issn = "1751-6757",

publisher = "Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.",

number = "2/3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The response of EU trade dependent firms to the globalization backlash

AU - Curran, Louise

AU - Eckhardt, Jappe

N1 - This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details

PY - 2022/7/4

Y1 - 2022/7/4

N2 - This paper seeks to expand our understanding of Corporate Political Activity (CPA) in trade policy by exploring the strategic responses of EU trade dependent firms (TDFs) to the recent backlash against globalization. We develop propositions on likely corporate strategies in this context and explore them in the EU. Our empirical focus is on four cases of trade policy changes over the period 2016-19 which reduced, or threatened to reduce, openness in different ways and with varying sectoral impacts. Propositions were explored through the analysis of public actions by TDFs and their associations, as well as 26 interviews. We find that few EU TDFs mobilized independently against protectionism. Rather, they overwhelmingly worked through their trade associations. Furthermore, the extent to which sectoral associations mobilized together or alone varied depending on the issue area and nature of the threats. We find limited evidence of trans-national lobbying or mobilization with civil society groups beyond the specific issue of Brexit.

AB - This paper seeks to expand our understanding of Corporate Political Activity (CPA) in trade policy by exploring the strategic responses of EU trade dependent firms (TDFs) to the recent backlash against globalization. We develop propositions on likely corporate strategies in this context and explore them in the EU. Our empirical focus is on four cases of trade policy changes over the period 2016-19 which reduced, or threatened to reduce, openness in different ways and with varying sectoral impacts. Propositions were explored through the analysis of public actions by TDFs and their associations, as well as 26 interviews. We find that few EU TDFs mobilized independently against protectionism. Rather, they overwhelmingly worked through their trade associations. Furthermore, the extent to which sectoral associations mobilized together or alone varied depending on the issue area and nature of the threats. We find limited evidence of trans-national lobbying or mobilization with civil society groups beyond the specific issue of Brexit.

U2 - 10.1504/EJIM.2021.10037410

DO - 10.1504/EJIM.2021.10037410

M3 - Article

SN - 1751-6757

VL - 18

SP - 283

EP - 328

JO - European Journal of International Management

JF - European Journal of International Management

IS - 2/3

ER -