By the same authors

From the same journal

The restorative benefits of walking in urban and rural settings in adults with good and poor mental health

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalHealth and Place
DateE-pub ahead of print - 10 Nov 2010
DatePublished (current) - Jan 2011
Issue number1
Volume17
Number of pages11
Pages (from-to)103–113
Early online date10/11/10
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

People differ in their potential for psychological restoration but there is little evidence on the role of varying mental health state or settings in the process. This paper reports two quasi-experiments which compare the restorative benefits of walking in urban and rural settings in two groups of adults with good and poor mental health. Two aspects of restoration are examined, firstly mood, the other using personal project techniques (Little, 1983) to capture an under-explored aspect of cognitive restoration through reflection on everyday life tasks. Results are consistent with a restorative effect of landscape: the rural walk was advantageous to affective and cognitive restoration in both health groups when compared to an urban walk. However, beneficial change took place to a greater extent in the poor health group. Differential outcomes between health groups were found in the urban setting, which was most advantageous to restoration in the poor mental health group. This study extends restorative environments research by showing that the amount of
change and context for restoration can differ amongst adults with variable mental health.

Bibliographical note

© 2010 Elsevier Ltd.

    Research areas

  • Restoration, MOOD, Personal Projects, mental health, setting

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations