The support priorities of multiply excluded homeless people and their compatibility with support agency agendas: new research into multiple exclusion homelessness

Graham Bowpitt; Peter Dwyer; Eva Sundin; Mark Weinstein

doi:10.1108/14608791111170274

The support priorities of multiply excluded homeless people and their compatibility with support agency agendas: new research into multiple exclusion homelessness

Graham Bowpitt, Peter Dwyer, Eva Sundin, Mark Weinstein

Social Policy and Social Work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Purpose
– This paper aims to throw light on the value of accommodation and support services and the likely consequences of their withdrawal.

Design/methodology/approach
– Research was completed by a team of researchers from Nottingham Trent and Salford Universities under the Multiple Exclusion Homelessness programme funded by CLG, the Economic and Social Research Council and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

Findings
– Agencies whose priorities are influenced by other agendas arising from statutory limitations or government targets have conflicting priorities that sustain multiple exclusion homelessness in a number of key circumstances.

Originality/value
– Findings from this research will enable policy‐makers and practitioners to take better account of service user perspectives, experiences and priorities.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	31-32
Number of pages	2
Journal	Housing, Care and Support
Volume	14
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1108/14608791111170274
Publication status	Published - 2011

Keywords

HOMELESSNESS
EXCLUSION
RIGHTS
RESPONSIBILITY

Access to Document

10.1108/14608791111170274

Cite this

@article{9ad9d784b6f248ce8182ac880986256f,

title = "The support priorities of multiply excluded homeless people and their compatibility with support agency agendas: new research into multiple exclusion homelessness",

abstract = "Purpose– This paper aims to throw light on the value of accommodation and support services and the likely consequences of their withdrawal.Design/methodology/approach– Research was completed by a team of researchers from Nottingham Trent and Salford Universities under the Multiple Exclusion Homelessness programme funded by CLG, the Economic and Social Research Council and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Findings– Agencies whose priorities are influenced by other agendas arising from statutory limitations or government targets have conflicting priorities that sustain multiple exclusion homelessness in a number of key circumstances.Originality/value– Findings from this research will enable policy‐makers and practitioners to take better account of service user perspectives, experiences and priorities.",

keywords = "HOMELESSNESS, EXCLUSION, RIGHTS, RESPONSIBILITY",

author = "Graham Bowpitt and Peter Dwyer and Eva Sundin and Mark Weinstein",

year = "2011",

doi = "10.1108/14608791111170274",

language = "English",

volume = "14",

pages = "31--32",

journal = "Housing, Care and Support",

publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The support priorities of multiply excluded homeless people and their compatibility with support agency agendas

T2 - new research into multiple exclusion homelessness

AU - Bowpitt, Graham

AU - Dwyer, Peter

AU - Sundin, Eva

AU - Weinstein, Mark

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Purpose– This paper aims to throw light on the value of accommodation and support services and the likely consequences of their withdrawal.Design/methodology/approach– Research was completed by a team of researchers from Nottingham Trent and Salford Universities under the Multiple Exclusion Homelessness programme funded by CLG, the Economic and Social Research Council and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Findings– Agencies whose priorities are influenced by other agendas arising from statutory limitations or government targets have conflicting priorities that sustain multiple exclusion homelessness in a number of key circumstances.Originality/value– Findings from this research will enable policy‐makers and practitioners to take better account of service user perspectives, experiences and priorities.

AB - Purpose– This paper aims to throw light on the value of accommodation and support services and the likely consequences of their withdrawal.Design/methodology/approach– Research was completed by a team of researchers from Nottingham Trent and Salford Universities under the Multiple Exclusion Homelessness programme funded by CLG, the Economic and Social Research Council and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Findings– Agencies whose priorities are influenced by other agendas arising from statutory limitations or government targets have conflicting priorities that sustain multiple exclusion homelessness in a number of key circumstances.Originality/value– Findings from this research will enable policy‐makers and practitioners to take better account of service user perspectives, experiences and priorities.

KW - HOMELESSNESS

KW - EXCLUSION

KW - RIGHTS

KW - RESPONSIBILITY

U2 - 10.1108/14608791111170274

DO - 10.1108/14608791111170274

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 31

EP - 32

JO - Housing, Care and Support

JF - Housing, Care and Support

IS - 1

ER -