The Unbelieved and historians, part III: Responses and Elaborations

Simon Richard Ditchfield, Roland Clark, Luke Clossey, David Gordon, Arlen Wiesenthal, Taymiya Zaman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The first two parts of "The Unbelieved" argued for the possibility of the existence of supernatural beings and for their agency in historical writing. This instalment is a roundtable assessing the problems and potential in the category of the Unbelieved and in its knowability. Space limitations prevented our following the rich avenues of further inquiry our extraordinary peer reviewers suggested, but we remain grateful, especially for their reminders of the complexity of motivations of historians who avoid the Unbelieved and their emphasis on the importance of humility as a historian's tool.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12430
Number of pages10
JournalHistory Compass
Volume15
Issue number12
Early online date8 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

Bibliographical note

© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Cite this