The validity of patient- and clinician-rated measures of needs and the therapeutic relationship in psychosis: A pooled analysis

Ulrich Reininghaus; Rosemarie McCabe; Mike Slade; Tom Burns; Tim Croudace; Stefan Priebe

doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2013.01.013

The validity of patient- and clinician-rated measures of needs and the therapeutic relationship in psychosis: A pooled analysis

Ulrich Reininghaus, Rosemarie McCabe, Mike Slade, Tom Burns, Tim Croudace, Stefan Priebe

The Hull York Medical School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Measuring outcomes of treatments for psychosis such as needs and the quality of the therapeutic relationship is important in research and routine care. However, evidence on the validity of existing outcome measures is limited. We aimed to test the convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of two widely used patient- and clinician-rated measures of needs and the therapeutic relationship. Multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) analysis was conducted on the Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule (CANSAS) and the Helping Alliance Scale (HAS), both the clinician (CANSAS-C, HAS-C) and patient (CANSAS-P, HAS-P) versions, in a pooled sample of 605 psychotic patients and their clinicians. CANSAS-C and CANSAS-P items loaded substantially into one common unmet needs factor. By comparison, substantial factor loadings were found for HAS-C and HAS-P items on two separate clinician- and patient-rated therapeutic relationship factors. Common unmet needs and clinician-rated therapeutic relationship factors significantly predicted reduced psychiatric in-patient days. Our findings support the convergent validity of the CANSAS, discriminant validity of the HAS, and predictive validity of CANSAS and HAS-C. The findings may inform the use of CANSAS and HAS as psychosis outcome measures in research and routine care.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	711-720
Journal	Psychiatry research
Volume	209
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2013.01.013
Publication status	Published - 26 Feb 2013

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

10.1016/j.psychres.2013.01.013

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178113000346

Cite this

@article{98cc0e8c8fc2424aaf15b51a730333a3,

title = "The validity of patient- and clinician-rated measures of needs and the therapeutic relationship in psychosis: A pooled analysis",

abstract = "Measuring outcomes of treatments for psychosis such as needs and the quality of the therapeutic relationship is important in research and routine care. However, evidence on the validity of existing outcome measures is limited. We aimed to test the convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of two widely used patient- and clinician-rated measures of needs and the therapeutic relationship. Multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) analysis was conducted on the Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule (CANSAS) and the Helping Alliance Scale (HAS), both the clinician (CANSAS-C, HAS-C) and patient (CANSAS-P, HAS-P) versions, in a pooled sample of 605 psychotic patients and their clinicians. CANSAS-C and CANSAS-P items loaded substantially into one common unmet needs factor. By comparison, substantial factor loadings were found for HAS-C and HAS-P items on two separate clinician- and patient-rated therapeutic relationship factors. Common unmet needs and clinician-rated therapeutic relationship factors significantly predicted reduced psychiatric in-patient days. Our findings support the convergent validity of the CANSAS, discriminant validity of the HAS, and predictive validity of CANSAS and HAS-C. The findings may inform the use of CANSAS and HAS as psychosis outcome measures in research and routine care.",

author = "Ulrich Reininghaus and Rosemarie McCabe and Mike Slade and Tom Burns and Tim Croudace and Stefan Priebe",

year = "2013",

month = feb,

day = "26",

doi = "10.1016/j.psychres.2013.01.013",

language = "English",

volume = "209",

pages = "711--720",

journal = "Psychiatry research",

issn = "0165-1781",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The validity of patient- and clinician-rated measures of needs and the therapeutic relationship in psychosis

T2 - A pooled analysis

AU - Reininghaus, Ulrich

AU - McCabe, Rosemarie

AU - Slade, Mike

AU - Burns, Tom

AU - Croudace, Tim

AU - Priebe, Stefan

PY - 2013/2/26

Y1 - 2013/2/26

N2 - Measuring outcomes of treatments for psychosis such as needs and the quality of the therapeutic relationship is important in research and routine care. However, evidence on the validity of existing outcome measures is limited. We aimed to test the convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of two widely used patient- and clinician-rated measures of needs and the therapeutic relationship. Multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) analysis was conducted on the Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule (CANSAS) and the Helping Alliance Scale (HAS), both the clinician (CANSAS-C, HAS-C) and patient (CANSAS-P, HAS-P) versions, in a pooled sample of 605 psychotic patients and their clinicians. CANSAS-C and CANSAS-P items loaded substantially into one common unmet needs factor. By comparison, substantial factor loadings were found for HAS-C and HAS-P items on two separate clinician- and patient-rated therapeutic relationship factors. Common unmet needs and clinician-rated therapeutic relationship factors significantly predicted reduced psychiatric in-patient days. Our findings support the convergent validity of the CANSAS, discriminant validity of the HAS, and predictive validity of CANSAS and HAS-C. The findings may inform the use of CANSAS and HAS as psychosis outcome measures in research and routine care.

AB - Measuring outcomes of treatments for psychosis such as needs and the quality of the therapeutic relationship is important in research and routine care. However, evidence on the validity of existing outcome measures is limited. We aimed to test the convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of two widely used patient- and clinician-rated measures of needs and the therapeutic relationship. Multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) analysis was conducted on the Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule (CANSAS) and the Helping Alliance Scale (HAS), both the clinician (CANSAS-C, HAS-C) and patient (CANSAS-P, HAS-P) versions, in a pooled sample of 605 psychotic patients and their clinicians. CANSAS-C and CANSAS-P items loaded substantially into one common unmet needs factor. By comparison, substantial factor loadings were found for HAS-C and HAS-P items on two separate clinician- and patient-rated therapeutic relationship factors. Common unmet needs and clinician-rated therapeutic relationship factors significantly predicted reduced psychiatric in-patient days. Our findings support the convergent validity of the CANSAS, discriminant validity of the HAS, and predictive validity of CANSAS and HAS-C. The findings may inform the use of CANSAS and HAS as psychosis outcome measures in research and routine care.

U2 - 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.01.013

DO - 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.01.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 23452753

SN - 0165-1781

VL - 209

SP - 711

EP - 720

JO - Psychiatry research

JF - Psychiatry research

IS - 3

ER -