Activities per year
Abstract
As international attention focuses on the rebuilding of Afghanistan, this paper looks critically at the evolution and meaning of the core concepts underpinning aims and strategies for recovery: the key role of institutional development and capacity building in establishing good governance based on collaboration between state, civil society and market; the empirical consensus, over many decades, for best practice in development; the acknowledgement that recovery of war-torn societies is a development challenge. It is shown that, despite this understanding, operational practice continues to contradict the principles and lessons learned from proven experience. The financial and administrative culture of the international institutions, lack of political will, donor conditionality and recipients' contrary agendas are seen to contribute to this failure. The paper concludes by examining the implications of this analysis for the recovery of Afghanistan.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 817-835 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Third World Quarterly |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2002 |
Keywords
- CIVIL-SOCIETY
- INSTITUTIONS
- GOVERNANCE
- FRAMEWORK
-
Principle Investigator and Team Leader of ‘The Study of National Solidarity Programme’s Impact on IDP/Refugee Returnee Reintegration in Afghanistan’
Sultan Barakat (Consultant)
Mar 2011 → Nov 2011Activity: Consultancy › Consultancy (in kind)
-
Output Leader to the Strategic Conflict Assessment team of DFID’s ‘Understanding Afghanistan’ initiative
Sultan Barakat (Advisor)
Mar 2008 → Aug 2008Activity: Consultancy › Consultancy (in kind)
-
Principle Investigator and Team Leader for the mid-term evaluation of the US$600 million National Solidarity Programme in Afghanistan.
Sultan Barakat (Consultant)
Oct 2005 → Mar 2006Activity: Consultancy › Consultancy (in kind)