Abstract
Background
Venous leg ulcers pose a significant burden for patients and healthcare systems. Ultrasound (US) may be a useful treatment for these ulcers.
Obejctives
To determine whether US increases the healing of venous leg ulcers.
Search strategy
We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 24 February 2010); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2010); Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to February Week 2 2010); In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations (searched 24 February 2010); Ovid EMBASE 1980 to 2010 Week 07; EBSCO CINAHL 1982 to 24 February 2010.
Selection criteria
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing US with no US.
Data collection and analysis
Two authors independently assessed the search results and selected eligible studies. Details from included studies were summarised using a data extraction sheet, and double-checked. We tried to contact trial authors for missing data.
Main results
Eight trials were included; all had unclear, or high, risks of bias, with differences in duration of follow-up, and US regimens. Six trials evaluated high frequency US and five of these reported healing at 7-8 weeks. Significantly more patients healed with US than without it at 7-8 weeks (pooled RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.96), but later assessments at 12 weeks showed the increased risk of healing with US was no longer statistically significant (pooled RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.20). One poor-quality study of high-frequency US found no evidence of an effect on healing after three weeks' treatment.
Two trials evaluated low frequency US and reported healing at different time points. Both trials reported no evidence of a difference in the proportion of ulcers healed with US compared with no US: both were significantly underpowered.
Author's conclusions
The trials evaluating US for venous leg ulcers are small, poor-quality and heterogeneous. There is no reliable evidence that US hastens healing of venous ulcers. There is a small amount of weak evidence of increased healing with US, but this requires confirmation in larger, high-quality RCTs. There is no evidence of a benefit associated with low frequency US.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | CD001180 |
| Pages (from-to) | - |
| Number of pages | 44 |
| Journal | Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Keywords
- Ultrasonic Therapy [economics]
- Quality of Life
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Varicose Ulcer [therapy]
- Wound Healing
- Humans
- LOW-FREQUENCY ULTRASOUND
- CONTROLLED-TRIAL
- HEALING TENDONS
- IN-VITRO
- ULCERATION
- INSUFFICIENCY
- ENHANCEMENT
- OSTEOBLASTS
- MUSCLE
- COSTS