By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Three Models of Political Membership: Delineating 'The People in Question'

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalOxford Journal of Legal Studies
DateE-pub ahead of print - 18 Dec 2020
DatePublished (current) - Jul 2021
Issue number2
Volume41
Pages (from-to)565–583
Early online date18/12/20
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

In her timely monograph, The People in Question, Jo Shaw provides a much-needed critical comparative review of the complex interactions between citizenship and constitutional law. In this essay, I argue that, despite its emphasis upon citizenship’s essentially contested nature, Shaw’s latest work contains rich moral commitments and an important caution against uncritically eliding ‘full citizenship’ with ‘political membership’ more broadly construed. To establish these claims, I present a tripartite taxonomy of approaches to defining ‘the people’ based, respectively, upon the concepts of status, subjugation, and duty. I claim that Shaw’s incisive analysis demonstrates perfectly why we should avoid placing undue reliance upon ‘status-based’ models of community membership and conclude by advancing an original, alternative, and hybridised model of ‘the people in question’.

    Research areas

  • Constitutional Theory, Citizenship, Legal Philosophy, Political Theory, Public International Law

???prize-relations???

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations