Toward a Syntactic Phylogeny of Modern Indo-European Languages

Giuseppe Longobardi; Cristina Guardiano; Giuseppina Silvestri; Alessio Boattini; Andrea Ceolin

doi:10.1075/jhl.3.1.07lon

Toward a Syntactic Phylogeny of Modern Indo-European Languages

Giuseppe Longobardi, Cristina Guardiano, Giuseppina Silvestri, Alessio Boattini, Andrea Ceolin

Language and Linguistic Science

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The Parametric Comparison Method (PCM, Guardiano & Longobardi 2005, Longobardi & Guardiano 2009) is grounded on the assumption that syntactic parameters are more appropriate than other traits for use as comparanda for historical reconstruction, because they are able to provide unambiguous correspondences and objective measurements, thus guaranteeing wide-range applicability and quantitative exactness. This article discusses a set of experiments explicitly designed to evaluate the impact of parametric syntax in representing historical relatedness, and performed on a selection of 26 contemporary Indo-European varieties. The results show that PCM is in fact able to correctly identify genealogical relations even from modern languages only, performing as accurately as lexical methods, and that its effectiveness is not limited by interference effects such as ‘horizontal’ transmission. PCM is thus validated as a powerful tool for the analysis of historical relationships not only on a long-range perspective (as suggested by Longobardi & Guardiano 2009), but even on more focused, though independently well-known domains.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	122-152
Number of pages	31
Journal	Journal of Historical Linguistics
Volume	3
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.3.1.07lon
Publication status	Published - 2013

Access to Document

10.1075/jhl.3.1.07lon

http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/jbp/jhl/2013/00000003/00000001/art00007?crawler=true

Cite this

@article{cc32cf7a0eb94cc88a4df08c719d79e8,

title = "Toward a Syntactic Phylogeny of Modern Indo-European Languages",

abstract = "The Parametric Comparison Method (PCM, Guardiano & Longobardi 2005, Longobardi & Guardiano 2009) is grounded on the assumption that syntactic parameters are more appropriate than other traits for use as comparanda for historical reconstruction, because they are able to provide unambiguous correspondences and objective measurements, thus guaranteeing wide-range applicability and quantitative exactness. This article discusses a set of experiments explicitly designed to evaluate the impact of parametric syntax in representing historical relatedness, and performed on a selection of 26 contemporary Indo-European varieties. The results show that PCM is in fact able to correctly identify genealogical relations even from modern languages only, performing as accurately as lexical methods, and that its effectiveness is not limited by interference effects such as {\textquoteleft}horizontal{\textquoteright} transmission. PCM is thus validated as a powerful tool for the analysis of historical relationships not only on a long-range perspective (as suggested by Longobardi & Guardiano 2009), but even on more focused, though independently well-known domains. ",

author = "Giuseppe Longobardi and Cristina Guardiano and Giuseppina Silvestri and Alessio Boattini and Andrea Ceolin",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.1075/jhl.3.1.07lon",

language = "English",

volume = "3",

pages = "122--152",

journal = "Journal of Historical Linguistics",

issn = "2210-2116",

publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward a Syntactic Phylogeny of Modern Indo-European Languages

AU - Longobardi, Giuseppe

AU - Guardiano, Cristina

AU - Silvestri, Giuseppina

AU - Boattini, Alessio

AU - Ceolin, Andrea

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The Parametric Comparison Method (PCM, Guardiano & Longobardi 2005, Longobardi & Guardiano 2009) is grounded on the assumption that syntactic parameters are more appropriate than other traits for use as comparanda for historical reconstruction, because they are able to provide unambiguous correspondences and objective measurements, thus guaranteeing wide-range applicability and quantitative exactness. This article discusses a set of experiments explicitly designed to evaluate the impact of parametric syntax in representing historical relatedness, and performed on a selection of 26 contemporary Indo-European varieties. The results show that PCM is in fact able to correctly identify genealogical relations even from modern languages only, performing as accurately as lexical methods, and that its effectiveness is not limited by interference effects such as ‘horizontal’ transmission. PCM is thus validated as a powerful tool for the analysis of historical relationships not only on a long-range perspective (as suggested by Longobardi & Guardiano 2009), but even on more focused, though independently well-known domains.

AB - The Parametric Comparison Method (PCM, Guardiano & Longobardi 2005, Longobardi & Guardiano 2009) is grounded on the assumption that syntactic parameters are more appropriate than other traits for use as comparanda for historical reconstruction, because they are able to provide unambiguous correspondences and objective measurements, thus guaranteeing wide-range applicability and quantitative exactness. This article discusses a set of experiments explicitly designed to evaluate the impact of parametric syntax in representing historical relatedness, and performed on a selection of 26 contemporary Indo-European varieties. The results show that PCM is in fact able to correctly identify genealogical relations even from modern languages only, performing as accurately as lexical methods, and that its effectiveness is not limited by interference effects such as ‘horizontal’ transmission. PCM is thus validated as a powerful tool for the analysis of historical relationships not only on a long-range perspective (as suggested by Longobardi & Guardiano 2009), but even on more focused, though independently well-known domains.

U2 - 10.1075/jhl.3.1.07lon

DO - 10.1075/jhl.3.1.07lon

M3 - Article

SN - 2210-2116

VL - 3

SP - 122

EP - 152

JO - Journal of Historical Linguistics

JF - Journal of Historical Linguistics

IS - 1

ER -