Towards the Definition of Best 3D Practices in Archaeology: Assessing 3D Documentation Techniques for Intra-site Data Recording.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalJournal of Cultural Heritage
DateAccepted/In press - 8 Jul 2015
DateE-pub ahead of print - 12 Aug 2015
DatePublished (current) - Jan 2016
Volume17
Number of pages11
Pages (from-to)159-169
Early online date12/08/15
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Archaeology is becoming increasingly ‘digital’. In the last 10 years, the use of 3D technologies for the documentation of tangible cultural heritage has changed the way to approach archaeological intra-site survey. These technologies allow for the reproduction of 3D replicas of sites and monuments and have proven to be a powerful tool for the documentation and preservation of the archaeological record. However, the full integration of 3D technologies in archaeological field methods requires the definition of best documentation practices and methods of accurate assessment of the acquired data. In fact, although the use of 3D laser scanners, computer vision and photogrammetric methods is now well established, there are no convincing quantitative comparisons between laser scanning and image-based modelling techniques for the acquisition of archaeological stratigraphy in extreme environmental and lighting conditions. In this sense the 3D documentation of the archaeological site of Las Cuevas, Belize, represented an important opportunity to test and compare phase shift variation laser scanning and image-based modelling techniques in an environment characterized by very high humidity and variability in lighting. This study compared both the accuracy and density reliability of 3D models showing how the different 3D documentation techniques can be integrated for the recording of the excavation process. The research presented in this paper provides an accurate data assessment representing a concrete starting point for the definition of a sharable and overall methodology that will help to define best 3D practices for the documentation of archaeological sites.

    Research areas

  • 3D documentation, Archaeological excavation, Laser scanner, Image-based modelling, Comparison, 3D practices

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations