Activities per year
Abstract
Bernard Pomerance’s play The Elephant Man (1977) and David Lynch’s 1980 film The Elephant Man can be regarded as twin foundational texts in the modern-day repurposing of the story of Joseph Merrick. The film, originally adapted in part from the surgeon Frederick Treves’ The Elephant Man and Other Reminiscences (1923) was subsequently adapted back into a film novelization by Christine Sparks. Pomerance’s play – often mistaken for the source of Lynch’s film - has been regularly revived in Britain and North America since, and is due to premiere in December 2014 in a new Broadway production starring Bradley Cooper.
Since the early 1980s, Merrick’s story in its various iterations has become a popular way to view nineteenth-century mores and to speculate on how far ‘we’ have come. However, this essay will argue that there is a series of tensions between the lip-service paid to the condemnation of Victorian freak shows and the uses to which Merrick’s image and story are put. The solemnity with which Merrick’s condition is treated has been undercut by jokey references in popular films, radio and television. In addition, as neo-Victorianists such as Helen Davies have argued, popular culture in the 21st century retains some strong features of the 19th century freak show. Moreover, the staging of Merrick’s life by a handsome Hollywood actor carries its own contradictions. Perhaps most powerfully, the recent rise of media fans as active creators and distributors of culture has, I suggest, resulted in historical figures like Merrick being sucked into a vortex of Victorian characters who become usable in fan art and fiction, from Jack the Ripper to Doctor Moreau. How does the contemporary fascination with neo-Victorian body-horror sit with the ethics of historical representation?
Since the early 1980s, Merrick’s story in its various iterations has become a popular way to view nineteenth-century mores and to speculate on how far ‘we’ have come. However, this essay will argue that there is a series of tensions between the lip-service paid to the condemnation of Victorian freak shows and the uses to which Merrick’s image and story are put. The solemnity with which Merrick’s condition is treated has been undercut by jokey references in popular films, radio and television. In addition, as neo-Victorianists such as Helen Davies have argued, popular culture in the 21st century retains some strong features of the 19th century freak show. Moreover, the staging of Merrick’s life by a handsome Hollywood actor carries its own contradictions. Perhaps most powerfully, the recent rise of media fans as active creators and distributors of culture has, I suggest, resulted in historical figures like Merrick being sucked into a vortex of Victorian characters who become usable in fan art and fiction, from Jack the Ripper to Doctor Moreau. How does the contemporary fascination with neo-Victorian body-horror sit with the ethics of historical representation?
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Rethinking the Nineteenth Century |
Editors | Anna Barton, Andrew Smith |
Place of Publication | Manchester |
Publisher | Manchester University Press |
Pages | 207-224 |
Number of pages | 18 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-1-7849-9510-2 |
Publication status | Published - 24 Jul 2017 |
Publication series
Name | Rethinking the Nineteenth Century |
---|---|
Publisher | Manchester University Press |
Activities
- 1 Seminar/workshop/course
-
Sheffield Centre for Nineteenth Century Studies Annual Workshop
Benjamin Poore (Invited speaker)
14 May 2015Activity: Participating in or organising an event › Seminar/workshop/course