By the same authors

From the same journal

Type I error rates for testing genetic drift with phenotypic covariance matrices: A simulation study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Type I error rates for testing genetic drift with phenotypic covariance matrices : A simulation study. / Prôa, M.; O'Higgins, P.; Monteiro, L.R.

In: Evolution: international journal of organic evolution, Vol. 67, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 185-195.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Prôa, M, O'Higgins, P & Monteiro, LR 2013, 'Type I error rates for testing genetic drift with phenotypic covariance matrices: A simulation study', Evolution: international journal of organic evolution, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 185-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01746.x

APA

Prôa, M., O'Higgins, P., & Monteiro, L. R. (2013). Type I error rates for testing genetic drift with phenotypic covariance matrices: A simulation study. Evolution: international journal of organic evolution, 67(1), 185-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01746.x

Vancouver

Prôa M, O'Higgins P, Monteiro LR. Type I error rates for testing genetic drift with phenotypic covariance matrices: A simulation study. Evolution: international journal of organic evolution. 2013 Jan 1;67(1):185-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01746.x

Author

Prôa, M. ; O'Higgins, P. ; Monteiro, L.R. / Type I error rates for testing genetic drift with phenotypic covariance matrices : A simulation study. In: Evolution: international journal of organic evolution. 2013 ; Vol. 67, No. 1. pp. 185-195.

Bibtex - Download

@article{beaf54a5bcdb4229a35e010f1b1802fc,
title = "Type I error rates for testing genetic drift with phenotypic covariance matrices: A simulation study",
abstract = "Studies of evolutionary divergence using quantitative genetic methods are centered on the additive genetic variance-covariance matrix (G) of correlated traits. However, estimating G properly requires large samples and complicated experimental designs. Multivariate tests for neutral evolution commonly replace average G by the pooled phenotypic within-group variance-covariance matrix (W) for evolutionary inferences, but this approach has been criticized due to the lack of exact proportionality between genetic and phenotypic matrices. In this study, we examined the consequence, in terms of type I error rates, of replacing average G by W in a test of neutral evolution that measures the regression slope between among-population variances and within-population eigenvalues (the Ackermann and Cheverud [AC] test) using a simulation approach to generate random observations under genetic drift. Our results indicate that the type I error rates for the genetic drift test are acceptable when using W instead of average G when the matrix correlation between the ancestral G and P is higher than 0.6, the average character heritability is above 0.7, and the matrices share principal components. For less-similar G and P matrices, the type I error rates would still be acceptable if the ratio between the number of generations since divergence and the effective population size (t/N) is smaller than 0.01 (large populations that diverged recently). When G is not known in real data, a simulation approach to estimate expected slopes for the AC test under genetic drift is discussed.",
author = "M. Pr{\^o}a and P. O'Higgins and L.R. Monteiro",
note = "{\circledC} 2012 The Author(s). Evolution{\circledC} 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution.",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01746.x",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "185--195",
journal = "Evolution: international journal of organic evolution",
issn = "0014-3820",
publisher = "Society for the Study of Evolution",
number = "1",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Type I error rates for testing genetic drift with phenotypic covariance matrices

T2 - Evolution: international journal of organic evolution

AU - Prôa, M.

AU - O'Higgins, P.

AU - Monteiro, L.R.

N1 - © 2012 The Author(s). Evolution© 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Studies of evolutionary divergence using quantitative genetic methods are centered on the additive genetic variance-covariance matrix (G) of correlated traits. However, estimating G properly requires large samples and complicated experimental designs. Multivariate tests for neutral evolution commonly replace average G by the pooled phenotypic within-group variance-covariance matrix (W) for evolutionary inferences, but this approach has been criticized due to the lack of exact proportionality between genetic and phenotypic matrices. In this study, we examined the consequence, in terms of type I error rates, of replacing average G by W in a test of neutral evolution that measures the regression slope between among-population variances and within-population eigenvalues (the Ackermann and Cheverud [AC] test) using a simulation approach to generate random observations under genetic drift. Our results indicate that the type I error rates for the genetic drift test are acceptable when using W instead of average G when the matrix correlation between the ancestral G and P is higher than 0.6, the average character heritability is above 0.7, and the matrices share principal components. For less-similar G and P matrices, the type I error rates would still be acceptable if the ratio between the number of generations since divergence and the effective population size (t/N) is smaller than 0.01 (large populations that diverged recently). When G is not known in real data, a simulation approach to estimate expected slopes for the AC test under genetic drift is discussed.

AB - Studies of evolutionary divergence using quantitative genetic methods are centered on the additive genetic variance-covariance matrix (G) of correlated traits. However, estimating G properly requires large samples and complicated experimental designs. Multivariate tests for neutral evolution commonly replace average G by the pooled phenotypic within-group variance-covariance matrix (W) for evolutionary inferences, but this approach has been criticized due to the lack of exact proportionality between genetic and phenotypic matrices. In this study, we examined the consequence, in terms of type I error rates, of replacing average G by W in a test of neutral evolution that measures the regression slope between among-population variances and within-population eigenvalues (the Ackermann and Cheverud [AC] test) using a simulation approach to generate random observations under genetic drift. Our results indicate that the type I error rates for the genetic drift test are acceptable when using W instead of average G when the matrix correlation between the ancestral G and P is higher than 0.6, the average character heritability is above 0.7, and the matrices share principal components. For less-similar G and P matrices, the type I error rates would still be acceptable if the ratio between the number of generations since divergence and the effective population size (t/N) is smaller than 0.01 (large populations that diverged recently). When G is not known in real data, a simulation approach to estimate expected slopes for the AC test under genetic drift is discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871941374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01746.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01746.x

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 185

EP - 195

JO - Evolution: international journal of organic evolution

JF - Evolution: international journal of organic evolution

SN - 0014-3820

IS - 1

ER -