Understanding care closer to home for ill children and young people

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding care closer to home for ill children and young people

AU - Spiers, G

AU - Parker, G

AU - Gridley, K

AU - Cusworth, L

AU - Mukherjee, S

AU - Heaton, J

AU - Atkin, Karl Michael

AU - Birks, Y

AU - Lowson, K

AU - Wright, D

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Aim: To gather evidence to support the implementation of standard six of the National Service Framework for Children, Young People and Maternity Services (Department of Health and Department for Education and Skills 2004), which states that care should be provided as close to home as possible. Methods: A mixed methods study comprising of a systematic review, a national survey of provision of care closer to home (CCTH), four in-depth, qualitative case studies and a cost analysis. Findings: The systematic review suggests that CCTH is no less clinically effective than hospital care. Services identified by the survey fall into three distinct models of provision. Case study data show that families preferred CCTH, but staff face difficulties at organisational and practice levels. Cost analysis suggests there can be cost savings with CCTH, but several factors influence these. Conclusion: CCTH may be an effective and feasible option for children and young people who are ill.

AB - Aim: To gather evidence to support the implementation of standard six of the National Service Framework for Children, Young People and Maternity Services (Department of Health and Department for Education and Skills 2004), which states that care should be provided as close to home as possible. Methods: A mixed methods study comprising of a systematic review, a national survey of provision of care closer to home (CCTH), four in-depth, qualitative case studies and a cost analysis. Findings: The systematic review suggests that CCTH is no less clinically effective than hospital care. Services identified by the survey fall into three distinct models of provision. Case study data show that families preferred CCTH, but staff face difficulties at organisational and practice levels. Cost analysis suggests there can be cost savings with CCTH, but several factors influence these. Conclusion: CCTH may be an effective and feasible option for children and young people who are ill.

KW - ill children and young people

KW - care closer to home

KW - nursing

KW - community care

KW - health care

KW - health services issues

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864093882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 29

EP - 34

JO - Nursing Children and Young People

JF - Nursing Children and Young People

IS - 5

ER -