By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

'Unilateral' and 'bilateral' practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

'Unilateral' and 'bilateral' practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment. / Collins, S.; Drew, P.; Watt, I.; Entwistle, V.

In: Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 61, No. 12, 12.2005, p. 2611-2627.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Collins, S, Drew, P, Watt, I & Entwistle, V 2005, ''Unilateral' and 'bilateral' practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment', Social Science & Medicine, vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 2611-2627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.047

APA

Collins, S., Drew, P., Watt, I., & Entwistle, V. (2005). 'Unilateral' and 'bilateral' practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment. Social Science & Medicine, 61(12), 2611-2627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.047

Vancouver

Collins S, Drew P, Watt I, Entwistle V. 'Unilateral' and 'bilateral' practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment. Social Science & Medicine. 2005 Dec;61(12):2611-2627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.047

Author

Collins, S. ; Drew, P. ; Watt, I. ; Entwistle, V. / 'Unilateral' and 'bilateral' practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment. In: Social Science & Medicine. 2005 ; Vol. 61, No. 12. pp. 2611-2627.

Bibtex - Download

@article{3b9e8adfc054496c8100c1817d584ba3,
title = "'Unilateral' and 'bilateral' practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment",
abstract = "Practitioners can present and discuss decisions about the management of health problems in a variety of ways during consultations. This paper examines in detail how doctors talk with patients in relation to decision-making about treatment. Conversation analyses of decision-making sequences in consultations about diabetes in primary care and about treatment of ear nose and throat (ENT) cancer in a specialist oncology setting, both in the UK, revealed a spectrum of practitioner approaches ranging from more 'bilateral' to more 'unilateral'. This paper identifies the key communicative and organisational features of these approaches and provides some preliminary observations about the implications of these for patient participation in decision-making. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "doctor-patient consultations, decision-making, conversation analysis, patient participation, United Kingdom, PATIENTS PARTICIPATION, GENERAL-PRACTICE, PHYSICIANS",
author = "S. Collins and P. Drew and I. Watt and V. Entwistle",
year = "2005",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.047",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "2611--2627",
journal = "Social Science & Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "12",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Unilateral' and 'bilateral' practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment

AU - Collins, S.

AU - Drew, P.

AU - Watt, I.

AU - Entwistle, V.

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - Practitioners can present and discuss decisions about the management of health problems in a variety of ways during consultations. This paper examines in detail how doctors talk with patients in relation to decision-making about treatment. Conversation analyses of decision-making sequences in consultations about diabetes in primary care and about treatment of ear nose and throat (ENT) cancer in a specialist oncology setting, both in the UK, revealed a spectrum of practitioner approaches ranging from more 'bilateral' to more 'unilateral'. This paper identifies the key communicative and organisational features of these approaches and provides some preliminary observations about the implications of these for patient participation in decision-making. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - Practitioners can present and discuss decisions about the management of health problems in a variety of ways during consultations. This paper examines in detail how doctors talk with patients in relation to decision-making about treatment. Conversation analyses of decision-making sequences in consultations about diabetes in primary care and about treatment of ear nose and throat (ENT) cancer in a specialist oncology setting, both in the UK, revealed a spectrum of practitioner approaches ranging from more 'bilateral' to more 'unilateral'. This paper identifies the key communicative and organisational features of these approaches and provides some preliminary observations about the implications of these for patient participation in decision-making. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - doctor-patient consultations

KW - decision-making

KW - conversation analysis

KW - patient participation

KW - United Kingdom

KW - PATIENTS PARTICIPATION

KW - GENERAL-PRACTICE

KW - PHYSICIANS

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.047

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.047

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 2611

EP - 2627

JO - Social Science & Medicine

JF - Social Science & Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 12

ER -