By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Uprooting class? Culture, world-making and reform

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Uprooting class? Culture, world-making and reform. / Latimer, Joanna; Munro, Rolland.

In: The Sociological Review, Vol. 63, No. 2, 01.05.2015, p. 415-432.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Latimer, J & Munro, R 2015, 'Uprooting class? Culture, world-making and reform', The Sociological Review, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 415-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12289

APA

Latimer, J., & Munro, R. (2015). Uprooting class? Culture, world-making and reform. The Sociological Review, 63(2), 415-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12289

Vancouver

Latimer J, Munro R. Uprooting class? Culture, world-making and reform. The Sociological Review. 2015 May 1;63(2):415-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12289

Author

Latimer, Joanna ; Munro, Rolland. / Uprooting class? Culture, world-making and reform. In: The Sociological Review. 2015 ; Vol. 63, No. 2. pp. 415-432.

Bibtex - Download

@article{1bd08d90258a47edb881b2bac4cdac56,
title = "Uprooting class?: Culture, world-making and reform",
abstract = "The paper opens up the issue of how to relate culture to class in the UK. First, problematizing the conflation of class with status - inherent to stratification models like the GBCS - we theorize culture as 'world-making' rather than limit culture to artistic or individual possession. Second, exploring culture in the wake of reforms aimed at local and institutional 'cultures' that are said to hold back economic growth, we examine power relations between class and culture. After clarifying how Weber's analysis of stratification keeps economic relations underpinning class distinct from the cultural mores of status groups, we point to a third dimension in his emphasis on parties - those groupings locked in the struggle for dominance across all levels and modes of life - as the 'house of power'. Contrary to his supposition of homogeneity, however, we suggest legitimation today requires contesting parties, including factions and interest groups, to recruit from across class and status groups. Arguing recruitment to parties is enhanced by a mood of endless reform - in which modernity appears bent on tearing up its own foundations - we indicate how the resulting sense of precariousness is augmented by the stratifying technologies of grading and ranking. The pertinent question is: Who benefits from endless reform? And if the answer is no more than to recognize how benefits are skewed to an 'elite' working on behalf of owners of capital, then it is time to put aside stratification for an analysis of class relations that pointedly attends to wider notions of culture by asking: Who gets the say in world-making?",
keywords = "Class, Culture, Modernity, Parties, Power, Precariousness, Reform, Stratification, World-making",
author = "Joanna Latimer and Rolland Munro",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1467-954X.12289",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "415--432",
journal = "The Sociological Review",
issn = "0038-0261",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uprooting class?

T2 - The Sociological Review

AU - Latimer, Joanna

AU - Munro, Rolland

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - The paper opens up the issue of how to relate culture to class in the UK. First, problematizing the conflation of class with status - inherent to stratification models like the GBCS - we theorize culture as 'world-making' rather than limit culture to artistic or individual possession. Second, exploring culture in the wake of reforms aimed at local and institutional 'cultures' that are said to hold back economic growth, we examine power relations between class and culture. After clarifying how Weber's analysis of stratification keeps economic relations underpinning class distinct from the cultural mores of status groups, we point to a third dimension in his emphasis on parties - those groupings locked in the struggle for dominance across all levels and modes of life - as the 'house of power'. Contrary to his supposition of homogeneity, however, we suggest legitimation today requires contesting parties, including factions and interest groups, to recruit from across class and status groups. Arguing recruitment to parties is enhanced by a mood of endless reform - in which modernity appears bent on tearing up its own foundations - we indicate how the resulting sense of precariousness is augmented by the stratifying technologies of grading and ranking. The pertinent question is: Who benefits from endless reform? And if the answer is no more than to recognize how benefits are skewed to an 'elite' working on behalf of owners of capital, then it is time to put aside stratification for an analysis of class relations that pointedly attends to wider notions of culture by asking: Who gets the say in world-making?

AB - The paper opens up the issue of how to relate culture to class in the UK. First, problematizing the conflation of class with status - inherent to stratification models like the GBCS - we theorize culture as 'world-making' rather than limit culture to artistic or individual possession. Second, exploring culture in the wake of reforms aimed at local and institutional 'cultures' that are said to hold back economic growth, we examine power relations between class and culture. After clarifying how Weber's analysis of stratification keeps economic relations underpinning class distinct from the cultural mores of status groups, we point to a third dimension in his emphasis on parties - those groupings locked in the struggle for dominance across all levels and modes of life - as the 'house of power'. Contrary to his supposition of homogeneity, however, we suggest legitimation today requires contesting parties, including factions and interest groups, to recruit from across class and status groups. Arguing recruitment to parties is enhanced by a mood of endless reform - in which modernity appears bent on tearing up its own foundations - we indicate how the resulting sense of precariousness is augmented by the stratifying technologies of grading and ranking. The pertinent question is: Who benefits from endless reform? And if the answer is no more than to recognize how benefits are skewed to an 'elite' working on behalf of owners of capital, then it is time to put aside stratification for an analysis of class relations that pointedly attends to wider notions of culture by asking: Who gets the say in world-making?

KW - Class

KW - Culture

KW - Modernity

KW - Parties

KW - Power

KW - Precariousness

KW - Reform

KW - Stratification

KW - World-making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931426869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1467-954X.12289

DO - 10.1111/1467-954X.12289

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 415

EP - 432

JO - The Sociological Review

JF - The Sociological Review

SN - 0038-0261

IS - 2

ER -