Use of prospective and retrospective risk assessment methods that simplify chemical mixtures associated with treated domestic wastewater discharges

Jerome Diamond*, Rolf Altenburger, Anja Coors, Scott D. Dyer, Michael Focazio, Karen Kidd, Albert A. Koelmans, Kenneth M.Y. Leung, Mark R. Servos, Jason Snape, Johannes Tolls, Xiaowei Zhang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A framework is presented that is intended to facilitate the evaluation of potential aquatic ecological risks resulting from discharges of down-the-drain chemicals. A scenario is presented using representatives of many of the types of chemicals that are treated domestically. Predicted environmental chemical concentrations are based on reported loading rates and routine removal rates for 3 types of treatment: trickling filter, activated sludge secondary treatment, and activated sludge plus advanced oxidation process as well as instream effluent dilution. In tier I, predicted effluent concentrations were compared with the lowest predicted-no-effect concentration (PNEC) obtained from the literature using safety factors as needed. A cumulative risk characterization ratio (cumRCR) < 1.0 indicates that risk is unlikely and no further action is needed. Otherwise, a tier 2 assessment is used, in which PNECs are based on trophic level. If tier 2 indicates a possible risk, then a retrospective assessment is recommended. In tier 1, the cumRCR was > 1.0 for all 3 treatment types in our scenario, even though no chemical exceeded a hazard quotient of 1.0 in activated sludge or advanced oxidation process. In tier 2, activated sludge yielded a lower cumRCR than trickling filter because of higher removal rates, and the cumRCR in the advanced oxidation process was << 1.0. Based on the maximum cumulative risk ratio (MCR), more than one-third of the predicted risk was accounted for by one chemical, and at least 90% was accounted for by 3 chemicals, indicating that few chemicals influenced the mixture risk in our scenario. We show how a retrospective assessment can test whether certain chemicals hypothesized as potential drivers in the prospective assessment could have, or are having, deleterious effects on aquatic life. Environ Toxicol Chem 2018;37:690–702.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)690-702
Number of pages13
JournalEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.

Keywords

  • Contaminants of emerging concern
  • Down-the-drain
  • Prospective risk
  • Retrospective risk assessment
  • Wastewater treatment

Cite this