By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Value for money and the Quality and Outcomes Framework in primary care in the UK NHS

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
DatePublished - May 2010
Issue number574
Volume60
Number of pages8
Pages (from-to)e213-e220
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Background

The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) is a pioneering attempt to improve the quality of primary care in the UK through the use of financial rewards. Despite its achievements, there are concerns that the QOF rimy offer poor value for money.

Aim

To assess the Cost-effectiveness of QOF payments.

Design of study

Economic analysis.

Setting

England, UK.

Method

Cost-effectiveness evidence was identified for a subset of nine QOF indicators with a direct therapeutic impact. These data were then applied to an analytic framework to determine the conditions under which QOF payments would be cost-effective. This framework was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness of QOF payments by modelling the incentive structure using cost-effectiveness thresholds of 20 000 and 30 000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, to represent good value to the NHS. It used 2004/2005 data on the QOF performance of all English primary care practices.

Results

Average indicator payments ranged from 0.63 to 40.61 per patient, and the percentage of eligible patients treated ranged from 63% to 90%. The proportional changes required for QOF payments to be cost-effective varied widely between the indicators. Although most indicators required only a fraction of a 1% change to be cost-effective, for some indicators improvements in performance of around 20% were needed.

Conclusion

For most indicators that can be assessed, QOF incentive payments are likely to be a cost-effective use of resources for a high proportion of primary care. practices, even if the QOF achieves only modest improvements.in care. However, only a small subset of the indicators has been considered, and no account has been taken of the costs of administering the QOF scheme.

    Research areas

  • cost-effectiveness, family practice, health care, physician incentive plans, quality indicators, HEALTH-CARE, PERFORMANCE, PAY, HYPERTENSION, MANAGEMENT, ENGLAND, IMPROVE

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations