By the same authors

From the same journal

Vicarious Liability for Employee Theft: Muddling Vicarious Liability for Conversion with Non-Delegable Duties

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review



Publication details

JournalLloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly
DatePublished - 2011
Number of pages7
Pages (from-to)172-178
Original languageEnglish


Assesses the Court of Appeal decision in Brink's Global Services Inc v Igrox Ltd on whether an employer was vicariously liable to a third party for the theft of its property by an employee or whether this liability only arose if the employer had undertaken a duty to the third party that had been delegated to the employee. Considers whether there had been an insufficient nexus between the employment and the theft since the employer had merely given the employee the opportunity to steal. Suggests that the defendant's liability should have been based on a direct non-delegable duty.

    Research areas

  • vicarious liability, tort

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations