Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified?

Ralf J Jox, Isra Black, Gian Domenico Borasio, Johanna Anneser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background
Physician-assisted dying has been the subject of extensive discussion and legislative activity both in Europe and North America. In this context, dying by voluntary stopping of eating and drinking (VSED) is often proposed, and practiced, as an alternative method of self-determined dying, with medical support for VSED being regarded as ethically and legally justified.

Argument
In our opinion, this view is flawed. First, we argue that VSED falls within the concept of suicide, albeit with certain unique features (non-invasiveness, initial reversibility, resemblance to the natural dying process). Second, we demonstrate, on the basis of paradigmatic clinical cases, that medically supported VSED is, at least in some instances, tantamount to assisted suicide. This is especially the case if a patient’s choice of VSED depends on the physician’s assurance to provide medical support.

Conclusion
Thus, for many jurisdictions worldwide, medically supported VSED may fall within the legal prohibitions on suicide assistance. Physicians, lawmakers, and societies should discuss specific ways of regulating medical support for VSED in order to provide clear guidance for both patients and healthcare professionals.
Original languageEnglish
Article number186
Number of pages5
JournalBMC Medicine
Volume15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Oct 2017

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s). 2017

Keywords

  • VSED
  • decision making
  • nutrition and hydration
  • palliative care
  • ethical analysis
  • medical ethics
  • law
  • ALS-CarE

    Black, I., Jox, R. J., Anneser, J. & Borasio, G. D.

    Project: Other projectResearch collaboration

Cite this