What do we Mean by Housing First?: Categorising and Critically Assessing the Housing First Movement from a European Perspective

Nicholas Pleace; Joanne Bretherton

What do we Mean by Housing First? Categorising and Critically Assessing the Housing First Movement from a European Perspective

Centre for Housing Policy

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

Abstract

While ‘Housing First’ can seem an ambiguous concept, this paper argues it is possible to broadly classify three main ‘Housing First’ variants and discuss their effectiveness. The paper argues that it is important that the core achievement of Housing First services in taking and keeping most of the people they work with out of a state of homelessness is not lost sight of as criticism of the approach increases. Debates about defining ‘Housing First’ are unproductive. There is evidence that the ‘pure’ form, Pathways Housing First model, and two broadly defined ‘Housing First’ variants that are influenced by, or reflect, the Pathways Housing First philosophy, ‘Communal Housing First’ and ‘Housing First Light’, can all deliver sustained exits from homelessness.

Original language	English
Publication status	Published - 24 Jun 2012
Event	ENHR Conference - Lillehammer, Norway Duration: 24 Jun 2012 → …

Conference

Conference	ENHR Conference
Country/Territory	Norway
City	Lillehammer
Period	24/06/12 → …

Access to Document

ENHRHFpaperNicholasPleace1
Open
Licence: Other

Cite this

@conference{edab4e30b44b471c936f2412d1f0cf73,

title = "What do we Mean by Housing First?: Categorising and Critically Assessing the Housing First Movement from a European Perspective ",

abstract = "While {\textquoteleft}Housing First{\textquoteright} can seem an ambiguous concept, this paper argues it is possible to broadly classify three main {\textquoteleft}Housing First{\textquoteright} variants and discuss their effectiveness. The paper argues that it is important that the core achievement of Housing First services in taking and keeping most of the people they work with out of a state of homelessness is not lost sight of as criticism of the approach increases. Debates about defining {\textquoteleft}Housing First{\textquoteright} are unproductive. There is evidence that the {\textquoteleft}pure{\textquoteright} form, Pathways Housing First model, and two broadly defined {\textquoteleft}Housing First{\textquoteright} variants that are influenced by, or reflect, the Pathways Housing First philosophy, {\textquoteleft}Communal Housing First{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}Housing First Light{\textquoteright}, can all deliver sustained exits from homelessness. ",

author = "Nicholas Pleace and Joanne Bretherton",

year = "2012",

month = jun,

day = "24",

language = "English",

note = "ENHR Conference ; Conference date: 24-06-2012",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - What do we Mean by Housing First?

T2 - ENHR Conference

AU - Pleace, Nicholas

AU - Bretherton, Joanne

PY - 2012/6/24

Y1 - 2012/6/24

N2 - While ‘Housing First’ can seem an ambiguous concept, this paper argues it is possible to broadly classify three main ‘Housing First’ variants and discuss their effectiveness. The paper argues that it is important that the core achievement of Housing First services in taking and keeping most of the people they work with out of a state of homelessness is not lost sight of as criticism of the approach increases. Debates about defining ‘Housing First’ are unproductive. There is evidence that the ‘pure’ form, Pathways Housing First model, and two broadly defined ‘Housing First’ variants that are influenced by, or reflect, the Pathways Housing First philosophy, ‘Communal Housing First’ and ‘Housing First Light’, can all deliver sustained exits from homelessness.

AB - While ‘Housing First’ can seem an ambiguous concept, this paper argues it is possible to broadly classify three main ‘Housing First’ variants and discuss their effectiveness. The paper argues that it is important that the core achievement of Housing First services in taking and keeping most of the people they work with out of a state of homelessness is not lost sight of as criticism of the approach increases. Debates about defining ‘Housing First’ are unproductive. There is evidence that the ‘pure’ form, Pathways Housing First model, and two broadly defined ‘Housing First’ variants that are influenced by, or reflect, the Pathways Housing First philosophy, ‘Communal Housing First’ and ‘Housing First Light’, can all deliver sustained exits from homelessness.

M3 - Paper

Y2 - 24 June 2012

ER -