By the same authors

From the same journal

Who said romance was dead?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Who said romance was dead? / Edmonds, M.

In: Journal of Material Culture, Vol. 11, No. 1-2, 07.2006, p. 167-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Edmonds, M 2006, 'Who said romance was dead?', Journal of Material Culture, vol. 11, no. 1-2, pp. 167-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183506063019

APA

Edmonds, M. (2006). Who said romance was dead? Journal of Material Culture, 11(1-2), 167-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183506063019

Vancouver

Edmonds M. Who said romance was dead? Journal of Material Culture. 2006 Jul;11(1-2):167-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183506063019

Author

Edmonds, M. / Who said romance was dead?. In: Journal of Material Culture. 2006 ; Vol. 11, No. 1-2. pp. 167-188.

Bibtex - Download

@article{b0c80872af0d43b1b9a9b1ed8ba0911b,
title = "Who said romance was dead?",
abstract = "This article uses recent work in the central Lake District to explore current approaches to prehistoric landscapes in Britain. It argues that those approaches owe much to ways of seeing, which have their roots in the Romantic tradition, in particular, a tendency to privilege vision over the other senses. The more recent history of the area is drawn upon to argue for approaches which deal more directly with the physical engagement with landscape at varied scales. Such an approach has implications for the ways that the area has been, and remains, caught up in discourses of identity.",
author = "M. Edmonds",
year = "2006",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1177/1359183506063019",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "167--188",
journal = "Journal of Material Culture",
issn = "1359-1835",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1-2",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who said romance was dead?

AU - Edmonds, M.

PY - 2006/7

Y1 - 2006/7

N2 - This article uses recent work in the central Lake District to explore current approaches to prehistoric landscapes in Britain. It argues that those approaches owe much to ways of seeing, which have their roots in the Romantic tradition, in particular, a tendency to privilege vision over the other senses. The more recent history of the area is drawn upon to argue for approaches which deal more directly with the physical engagement with landscape at varied scales. Such an approach has implications for the ways that the area has been, and remains, caught up in discourses of identity.

AB - This article uses recent work in the central Lake District to explore current approaches to prehistoric landscapes in Britain. It argues that those approaches owe much to ways of seeing, which have their roots in the Romantic tradition, in particular, a tendency to privilege vision over the other senses. The more recent history of the area is drawn upon to argue for approaches which deal more directly with the physical engagement with landscape at varied scales. Such an approach has implications for the ways that the area has been, and remains, caught up in discourses of identity.

U2 - 10.1177/1359183506063019

DO - 10.1177/1359183506063019

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 167

EP - 188

JO - Journal of Material Culture

JF - Journal of Material Culture

SN - 1359-1835

IS - 1-2

ER -