Abstract
The costs and benefits of cooperative monetary and fiscal policy are analysed in the framework of a partisan business-cycles model. It is shown that political parties with different ideologies prefer to choose different arrangements for macroeconomic policy-making. More specifically, right-wing parties favour independent central banks more than left-wing parties. An independent central bank is also the generally preferred option from a social welfare point of view. In addition, the form of policy-making arrangements between the fiscal and monetary authorities is shown to influence the extent of partisan cycles.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 621-643 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Scandinavian Journal of Economics |
Volume | 102 |
Issue number | 4 |
Publication status | Published - 2000 |
Keywords
- cooperation
- monetary and fiscal authorities
- independent central banks
- partisan cycles
- MACROECONOMIC POLICY
- DISCRETION
- CYCLES
- GAME