TY - JOUR
T1 - Youth co-authorship as public engagement with geoengineering
AU - Dunlop, Lynda
AU - Rushton, Elizabeth
AU - Atkinson, Lucy
AU - Cornelissen, Eef
AU - de Schrijver, Jelle
AU - Stadnyk, Tetiana
AU - Stubbs, Joshua
AU - Su, Chrissy
AU - Turkenburg, Maria Gertrudis Wilhelmina
AU - Fernanda, Veneu
AU - Blake, Celena
AU - Calvert, Saul
AU - Dècle, Clémentine
AU - Dhassi, Kirndeep
AU - Edwards, Rosalind
AU - Malaj, Greta
AU - Mirjanić, Jovana
AU - Saunders, William
AU - Sinkovec, Yara
AU - Vellekoop, Suzan
AU - Yuan, Xinyue
N1 - This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details
PY - 2022/1/30
Y1 - 2022/1/30
N2 - Large-scale intervention in the Earth’s climate system (‘geoengineering’ or ‘climate engineering’) is increasingly present in discussions about possible responses to climate change. Research has tended to focus on the acceptability of geoengineering proposals to adults, with youth perspectives under-represented despite the intergenerational consequences of policy in this field. We report on a novel participatory approach to research and practice, resulting in the co-creation of a youth guide and policy brief by participants (aged 17-26) and facilitators. Findings fall into two categories: those pertaining to youth priorities for geoengineering and those in relation to authorial responsibility as an approach to engagement and advancing youth voices. We argue that co-creative and participatory approaches avoid polarisation and build reciprocity into the research process, promoting rational discourse about geoengineering and climate change and its intersection with ethics, politics and society. The model is potentially valuable for engaging youth at the early stages of technoscientific innovations. Tentative conclusions from youth participants are that mitigation efforts must be prioritised, i.e. action is needed now to mitigate and adapt to climate change, and there is a need for proactive international cooperation on the governance of geoengineering and for investment in research to understand potential environmental and social consequences of geoengineering for people at different temporal and spatial scales. Greater public dialogue on geoengineering and its governance is needed, particularly involving young people. The youth guide and policy brief co-authored by participants and facilitators, and the dialogic methods used in their production, can contribute to this dialogue.
AB - Large-scale intervention in the Earth’s climate system (‘geoengineering’ or ‘climate engineering’) is increasingly present in discussions about possible responses to climate change. Research has tended to focus on the acceptability of geoengineering proposals to adults, with youth perspectives under-represented despite the intergenerational consequences of policy in this field. We report on a novel participatory approach to research and practice, resulting in the co-creation of a youth guide and policy brief by participants (aged 17-26) and facilitators. Findings fall into two categories: those pertaining to youth priorities for geoengineering and those in relation to authorial responsibility as an approach to engagement and advancing youth voices. We argue that co-creative and participatory approaches avoid polarisation and build reciprocity into the research process, promoting rational discourse about geoengineering and climate change and its intersection with ethics, politics and society. The model is potentially valuable for engaging youth at the early stages of technoscientific innovations. Tentative conclusions from youth participants are that mitigation efforts must be prioritised, i.e. action is needed now to mitigate and adapt to climate change, and there is a need for proactive international cooperation on the governance of geoengineering and for investment in research to understand potential environmental and social consequences of geoengineering for people at different temporal and spatial scales. Greater public dialogue on geoengineering and its governance is needed, particularly involving young people. The youth guide and policy brief co-authored by participants and facilitators, and the dialogic methods used in their production, can contribute to this dialogue.
KW - geoengineering
KW - Climate Change Act; climate policy; The Big Ask; Friends of the Earth; policy entrepreneur; Multiple Streams Framework
KW - participatory approaches
KW - youth
KW - policy
UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21548455.2022.2027043
U2 - 10.1080/21548455.2022.2027043
DO - 10.1080/21548455.2022.2027043
M3 - Article
SN - 2154-8455
VL - 12
SP - 60
EP - 74
JO - International Journal of Science Education Part B
JF - International Journal of Science Education Part B
IS - 1
ER -